“The little space within the
heart is as great as the vast universe. The heavens and the earth are there,
and the sun and the moon and the stars. Fire and lightening and winds are
there, and all that now is and all that is not.” The Upanishads.
(Read Part One of this post first. )
(Read Part One of this post first.
How can a nation and culture the
size of Wales maintain its unique identity and language without becoming exclusive?
The best answer I ever heard on this subject was made from a Christian
perspective, although it’s not necessary to be Christian in order to believe in
and apply its spiritual message.
I came across this idea in A.M.
Allchin’s brilliant little gem on the Welsh poetic tradition entitled Praise Above All: Discovering the WelshTradition. The idea centres on the polarity between the biblical ‘myths’ of
Babel and Pentecost.
The Babel Myth.
In the Old Testament story of Babel,
all humanity comes together in unity. The people build a giant, towering city
reaching the heavens. They live there together in the one location and they all
speak the same language.
This is against the will of God,
who originally decreed that human kind should “spread out, fill the earth and
become many.” God deliberately ‘strikes’ the people of Babel with multiple languages
in order to confuse their efforts.
With everyone speaking a different
tongue and no one able to understand his or her neighbor, the inhabitants of Babel
are no longer able to cooperate effectively. Eventually they disperse to different
regions of the earth and become various nations.
The Pentecost Myth.
At the other end of the biblical
story, in the New Testament, the story of Pentecost repairs or heals the
division originally caused at Babel. Confused tongues are replaced by tongues
of fire that float above the heads of believers as they miraculously
communicate with foreigners who speak alien languages.
The interesting thing here is
that God doesn’t unify people by replacing all the various languages with one universal
language. Unity coexists with variety – it doesn’t come through uniformity. The
Spirit gives different gifts for each individual.
The harmony this miracle brings
thrives in freedom and the tolerance of difference. It brings out multiplicity instead of seeking
to suppress it, continuing the richness of the universe that God has created
from the beginning.
This idea of catholicity has been
a teaching of the Christian church from the outset. The apostle Paul attempts
to explain this unity in diversity with the illustration of the human body.
There is one body made up of multiple parts – eyes, nose, arms, feet etc. Each
part has its own unique attributes and abilities (‘gifts’) to bring to unified
functioning of the whole.
“Edau caeth brawdoliaeth dyn, edau ein rhyddid wedyn (In the binding
yarn of brotherhood is also the thread of our freedom).” James Nicholas.
Unity in the Spirit.
“The human being is part of the
whole, called by us the ‘universe,’ a part limited in time and space. He experiences
himself, his thoughts and feelings, as something separate from the rest — a
kind of optical delusion of consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison
for us, restricting us to our personal desires. Our task must be to free
ourselves from this prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all
living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty.” Albert Einstein.
So it is with the mystical unity
of the ‘Church’ (the entire body of Christian believers throughout the ages, despite
their being separated by time, distance, race, culture and language). But the
Spirit that seeks to unify humanity in this way needn’t be (and arguably cannot
possibly be) confined to the sphere of organized Christian religion alone.
“Ynof mae Cymru’n un (In me, Wales is one).” Waldo Williams.
Allchin quotes the Methodist missionary
John D. Davies in this regard. Davies experienced the meeting of major and
minor languages whilst working in southern Africa, where dominant international
cultures were imposing themselves upon the many threatened, local, minority
cultures. Davies used the Pentecost story to speak in their defence:
“The miracle of Pentecost is not
just that people are enabled to understand each other . . . The point is made
with considerable emphasis, that communication comes to them not in the
international language of the powerful, but in the local languages of family,
region, nation . . . This is the heart of the miracle. Our own language,
however insignificant in the eyes of the empire builders and powerful
advertisers, is claimed as a suitable vehicle for the good news . . . Those who
heard the apostles’ words did not only get information about events external to
themselves; they also got an assurance of their own value, through the
affirming language which shaped their basic perceptions.” John D. Davies, The Faith Abroad.
The language of a people is
inseparable from their perception of the world and themselves. The destruction of a people’s language is therefore
not only a loss in terms of their identity as a people, but also as people. Welsh nationalism, in so far
as it remembers itself within the unity of all humanity, opposes fascism,
opposes imposed uniformity. As
someone once put it, “the struggle for the Welsh language is a victory for all indigenous
languages everywhere.”
Fiat Lingua: Against Uniformity.
“I think one of the greatest
threats to the twentieth century, which is symbolized as a well as represented
by the threat of nuclear extinction, is that of sameness, uniformity, of seeing
all things and all places as if they were one. But the parochial poet can help
make the world larger again, and can help us to breathe, can help us to feel
the reality of the world in which we live by dwelling upon the particular, by
discovering or rediscovering the particular . . . Drawing attention to the
reality of any particular place does something rather similar for all other
places.” Jeremy Hooker.
“The disappearance of nations
would impoverish us, not less than if all men were to become alike, with one
personality and one face. Nations are the wealth of mankind, its generalized personalities;
the least among them has its own unique coloration and harbours within itself a
unique facet of God’s design.” Alexander Solzhenitsyn.